Santa Barbara, California US
I love this photo because, just as our firm is a global company so too the ocean is not restricted to a country or continent and has a great calmness about it.
photo credit: cyanocorax

- 1709 Copyright Blog
- Afro-IP
- BLOG@IP::JUR
- Class 46
- GRAY on Claims
- Holman's Biotech IP Blog
- IAM Magazine
- Intellectual Property Watch
- Inventive Step
- IP ADR Blog
- IP Asset Maximizer Blog
- IP finance
- IP tango
- IPDragon
- ipeg
- IPKat
- ITC 337 Law Blog
- Managing Intellectual Property
- Michael Geist's Blog
- Orange Book Blog
- Patent Baristas
- Patent Circle
- Patent Docs
- Patently-O
- PatLit
- Peter Zura's 271 Blog
- Register trademark
- SpicyIP
- Tangible IP
- The IP Factor
- TTABlog
|
|
Thursday, January 1, 2009 — IP WARS, GLOBAL IP STRATEGY Who cares about precedent?by Duncan Bucknell
In our most recent podcast call, Jeremy Phillips and I discussed precedent. As Jeremy noted - it doesn't really matter what you call it - people will still take it to have at least some precedential weight. Even in China, where there is ostensibly no doctrine of precedent, you will final lawyers very carefully analysing the latest judgments from the Courts. Why? Because strategically, the more you can understand and predict the way a court is going to react, the more certainty you can bring to bear in planning out and choosing amongst the possible future scenarios. It's part of the Strategic terrain. Photo Credit: dbking Post a Comment | + del.icio.us | + technorati | tweet this | email this 0 Comments |




















Do you care about precedent? Should you?

